Correct The Recrd By Mary Prantil Pictures Google Search Mary Prantil
mary prantil PRANTIL MARY mary t. prantil mary theresa prantil PRANTIL T MARY mary teresa prantil prantil PRANTIL'S ARREST RECORDS criminal records of mary prantil mary prantils blogs wordpress prantil BOGUS BLOGS BY MARY facebook prantil prantil on face book mary prantil's blogs blog sites by mary prantil criminal records of mary prantil cyber stalker prantil jan windglows on twiter spell casting scam jan windglows on twitter jim morgan jim drews correct the record mary prantiul corrects the record queen lilith web site criminal mary prantil jim morgan james morgan james morgan II jan windglows janhett t windglows janhett windglows enchantress jan windglows enchantress enchantress jan windglows blood love and lust spells dragon spells castle dragons eye jan windglows - jim morgan jim morgan - jan windglows james r. morgan morgan james windglows jan janhett Tayler windglows windglows t janhett dragon spells cyber stalker mary t. prantil cyber harassment phone stalker new york police department NYCP NYPD rikers island prison look up look up inmate mary prantil Manhattan cyber stalker prantil LOOK UP PRANTIL'S RECORDS
Eye Witnesses And Evidence
Mary Prantil's SOON upcoming October 14th 2010 Criminal Court Trial -she is facing not one but SEVERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES including a FELONY STALKING CHARGE ( 3rd degree stalking )
Log in as a public user, then type in the defendant's name, Mary Prantil to pull up and verify her criminal charges- this is a government public records website, which is the Manhattan New York District Attorney web site, court cases look up information:
CASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court Case #2009NY046033 DefendantPrantil, Mary T
MORE, AND MORE AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, THESE ARE ARRAIGNMENT CHARGES- ALL OF THEM.
L 240.30 02
Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
L 215.50 03
Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionCrim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt
L 240.30 1A **TOP CHARGE**
Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAggravated Harassment-2nd Deg
Be sure to visit this website often for more and current updates on the CRIMINAL that keeps saying "she has a clean criminal record"....."has never been arrested"..........MARY PRANTIL.
Prantil is all over the Internet trying to cover this information up, blaming innocent others with her OWN CRIMES, telling lies, making up tons of false stories, etc. concerning this.
The information on this website has been taken from public records, and court transcripts with links provided so the public can cross check the information.
Mary T. Prantil Caught Slamming & Scamming
proof is HERE all about Mary T. Prantil's lies concerning her allegedly getting
"ripped off", her lies of being a victim of "identity theft", and
the real truth about Mary Prantil charging back with Pay Pal after services were
rendered to her the liar criminal Mary
T. Prantil's LIAR mouth is on fire as usual.
ANYONE HAVE A BIG FIRE HOSE TO PUT IT OUT, LOL???? Let us begin by viewing Miss
Prantil's sites that go on in explaining how she has never and at any time ever
spell cast in her ENTIRE LIFE and that some gypsy scum reader, as she likes to
call us, or some "clairvoyant" that, according to her lies had tried to rip her
off for $ 5,000.
I personally read over her sites it's really hard for me to stomach this boloney
for more then five minutes as I know
the real truth about this person. After reading some of her so-called "STELLAR
REVIEWS", fake résumé and questionable
character references on these questionable sites please come back to this
that your back and laughing really hard to the point of tears, I'd like you to
read the following statements below from
another spell caster being Mr. Cahill of magic angel spells whom actually
performed work for Prantil
at one time in the recent past. The same Spell Casting site in whom Miss Prantil
attempted to have curses
cast on Jan and myself for allegedly ripping her off according to Mr. Cahill.
see where Miss Prantil became very angry with Mr. Cahill for not assisting her
in cursing us, Again, according to Mr.
Cahill, then see where Miss Prantil contacted my Ex-wife, Miss Schaub after
Mr. Cahill apparently dropped Prantil for charging back on him a couple of times
for services he rendered to Miss Prantil. Again
read the statements Celeste Schaub is making concerning her encounter with
Prantil in the way that Prantil is asking her
to throw curses on not only us in this instance but Mr. Cahill as well for
dropping her case.
up the information below if you like as it's all factual and can be confirmed by
Mr. Cahill himself or Pay Pal.I
believe Mr. Cahill would welcome your questions at this point regarding this
matter as he's tired of Prantil's games
along with my Ex, or being pulled up in the games of Miss Prantil regarding ror
and prantil other statements
on air found on many other gripe sites.
other words, Prantil is saying one thing to folks and doing another thing in
private, stating something completely opposite
to factual information and truth on the net and carrying out slanderous and
harassing deeds in private. Miss
Prantil's constant or repeated claims that she was ripped off from various spell
sites from behind her numerous fictitious
names on ror is in all actually the exact opposite of what had occurred with
prantil in real life and this is proven
in this post and in other verifiable documentation.
was Miss Prantil that was carrying out the con games, or rip offs against these
magick sites and not the sites ripping her off...
isn't this a eye opener ?
pages on her site should be: Mary T. Prantil The Stellar Rip Off Artist lol. So,
what I'd like to ask Prantil would be :
say that you were never ripped off on
your sites and that you alone prevented this, correct
state the opposite thing by saying that you were in all your
belligerent postings and direct telephone calls and
nasty emails to not just one, but all of us. We all have all the emails
and voice recordings over a three
or four year span of time pertaining to these nasty
also have Prantil's statements that
not only did she trust us, but was extremely happy with her services from ALL OF
how can you state otherwise on your sites by saying that you never had, or
engaged in any type of black magic
spell castings against anyone, how do you explain these hard copy records below
? not to mention the current ones
we hold on you ? Wow, there seems to be a little discrepancy in your statements,
wouldn't you agree ? In
short your telling people one thing on your sites but we can prove otherwise and
thus showing that your a liar.
which is it Miss Prantil ? did you get ripped off ? or did you escape the
clutches of some nasty Psychic as you go
on about on your sites ?. We have recording of Miss Prantil calling us gypsy
scum that correlate with her postings on Rip
Off Reports not to mention her calling us scams and con artist.
you lying, Prantil ? or did you have spell work performed in your behalf ? What
about Your claim of Identity theft ? Who
would want your identity ? I wouldn't. What is your basis for the claim of
identity theft ? would that be you actually signing
contracts and making deals for black magic spells to dominate someone else's
mind to your own needs ? Well,
we have your records and can prove all your dealings with us. You rail on Rip
Off Reports while stating that any
one can say whatever they want, and that Ed Magedson is a criminal; well you
should know Prantil as you've been
up there posting enough smut on innocent people.
bother answering any of these questions above Miss Prantil, as it is hugely
apparent to everyone at this point in what your really doing up here not to mention
what you've carried out to innocent businesses along the way in the past and
attempted to rip off one site and was successful in ripping off another magic
site along with a another unrelated Tarot Reader that I know of so far, and
this is setting the record straight by confirming it with proof. Everyone can
see how you've jumped from one site or business to another while trying to
get them to cast negative spells on another including death spells, love
spells and sexual spells.
can see all your begging and threats to slander us along with you
actually carrying these threats out with your obvious postings on ror and other
sites, We can see how poorly you lie. We can see quite clearly in how you've
played these sites against one and the other in the past. It's now quite evident
that your nothing but a really nasty, two bit scam artist who is pis_ed off
because you've been EXPOSED for your scams that everyone moreover sees you for
what you are and knows what you've doing little miss self-proclaimed NY stand
up comic from corporate America Whanna BEEE.
know, we all have pages
and pages of phone records and harassing phone voice messages connecting you
to us through your threats, we have canceled checks from you not leaving
backs in various pay pal accounts and attempted charge backs. We have you on
tape threatening to turn in every one of us to this state of federal
false allegations, charges or police reports.
know we do Prantil, Don't you
?. It seems to me that you were telling us at one point in your postings
Mr. Cahill had helped you along with the communications we've shown to everyone
where your making this same positive statement about Jan and myself. So why
are you posting smut on us now ? Why are you trying to connect us to each other
in your post when you know were separate rival sites, and or competitors ? sounds
like some more slamming and scamming going on here on your end, HUH Mary ???
Prantil yells the loudest about being scammed, yet she is the biggest
scam artist in the world and on the net, Miss Prantil talks about FRAUD yet
it's on record regarding her attempted and actual credit card fraud through Pay
Pal to my understanding. Miss Prantil brags about how she can acquire services
or items, only to use them and return these items back to the store on a
how she obtains services from on-line business only
to harass and threaten this same business in question until they refund her money
back just to get rid of her. What does this make Mary T. Prantil ? Let me answer
this for you : She is a petty two bit CRIMINAL, Thief, scam artist of the worst
kind and a habitual lire to boot. Please read the Cahill and Schaub information
below, Again, call them and inquire about this posted information and
I believe that they will address your questions in a forthright and honest way.
LIAR & THIEF IN THE ACT Called Mary
I, MARY PRANTIL, AM TELLING MY
STORY TO CORRECT THE RECORD!
Story: About 3 years ago (Oct 2006) my Father died of cancer and to deal
I foolishly went to a Psychic for a Psychic Reading who wanted to also scam me
for thousands of dollars by encouraging me to buy Psychic Love Spells. It
Scam Artist Psychic that retaliated when they realized I could not be scammed
for thousands of dollars. So for over 3 years now, the Scam Artist Psychic
posted all the false claims about me on Rip-off Report.com. I originally went
to the Psychic because I was very devastated by my Dad's untimely death. It's
not a crime to go to a Psychic or even buy a Psychic Reading. I did not Rip-off
anyone. I asked the Psychic for my money back when I realized my mistake.
So the Scam Artist and "so called Psychic" retaliated by posting all of these
false claims on Ripoff Report.com for over 3 years without my permission. Clearly,
the Scam Psychic has no life or real business with legitimate clients to
continue for 3 years to post more false claims with no contact from me.
years ago, I asked the Scam Artist Psychic for a refund for a pathetic Psychic
Reading where I was not satisified and made it clear I felt I was ripped off.
And I stated to the scam Psychic that I did not want to purchase any future Psychic
Readings or any spells whatsoever. I wanted my money back for the Psychic
Reading. It's not a crime to get a Psychic Reading. The only thing I was guilty
of was being foolish to ever contact this Psychic. I believe in God and I now
realize it was wrong to go to this Psychic. I learned my lesson to rely on my
faith and not get Psychic Readings from Scam Artist on-line who prey on vulnerable
innocent people. But again - getting a Psychic Reading is not a crime.
In retrospect, I was really missing my Dad. I made a mistake to ever purchase
a Psychic Reading on-line but it is not a crime. Over 3 years ago, I asked
Ed Magedson to remove the false information about me from Ripoff Report.com
and he refuses. I even scanned and sent him my Clean Criminal Record. Therefore,
Ed Magedson is the real Criminal and Ripoff King not to be taken seriously.
T. Prantil's BOGUS Web Sites: (
UP STORY... BAD MOUTHING ED MAGEDSON OF ROR )
**The links below show how Prantil has changed/ALTERED her cover up story.....**
C:\Users\jan\Documents\Downloads\PRANTIL SITE # 1.mht
RECORD Mary Prantil2.mht
Mike Cahill & Celeste Schaub Tells All, How To Catch A Theif Named Marry T. Prantil ----- Original Message ----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org To: email@example.com Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:15 AM Subject: PayPal: Initial Inquiry: Case ID - PP-467-553-217
Dear stanley cahill,
We recently received a complaint regarding merchandise that was never received or received significantly not as described. The details of this transaction are as follows:
Transaction Date: Sep 6, 2007 Transaction Amount: -$1, 500.00 USD Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Case Number: PP-467-553-217
Seller's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G
Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Buyer's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G
We are contacting you to let you know that we will not be continuing this investigation because this complaint was filed 45 or more days after the original transaction date. However, we reserve the right for the next 180 days to begin an investigation if we later determine that this complaint should be examined.
We are committed to providing our community a safe environment in which to transact. As stated in the PayPal User Agreement, we reserve the right to close or limit an account in response to excessive complaints received about failure to ship merchandise, non-delivery of services, merchandise not as described, or problems with merchandise shipped.
You do not need to contact PayPal at this time, however, we encourage you to work directly with the buyer to amicably resolve this matter.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely, PayPal Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page. If your inquiry is regarding a claim, log in to your PayPal account and go to the Resolution Center.
PayPal Email ID PP822
----- Original Message ----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org To: email@example.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:39 PM Subject: Notification of chargeback reversal: Case ID #PP-396-648-789 - PM001
Dear stanley cahill,
We recently notified you that one of your buyers filed a chargeback stating unauthorized use of a credit card.
It is PayPal's standard practice to dispute unwarranted chargebacks. Using the information you provided, we are in the process of disputing this chargeback with the buyer's card issuer.
Because the card issuer has reversed this charge, PayPal is temporarily holding an amount equal to the disputed funds until this matter is resolved. If the card issuer decides the case in your favor, the funds will be available in your PayPal account.
The credit card company has charged PayPal a settlement fee for this chargeback. In accordance with the terms of the PayPal User Agreement, we have debited your PayPal account to cover this fee.
To learn more about how to respond to this chargeback, visit the Resolution Center and click "Resolution Center tutorials".
If you have additional information you’d like to upload or fax to us, please provide it as soon as possible. Just log in to your PayPal account, go to the Resolution Center, and click the “Details” link next to this case. For faster processing, choose “Upload files.”
We understand that you may not have been expecting this chargeback. If this chargeback has made your PayPal account balance negative, please reimburse us by adding funds to your account or by sending a check to the following address:
PayPal Attn: Accounting Department P.O. Box 45950 Omaha, NE 68145-0950 United States
Please submit your response in the next 72 hours. The chargeback dispute process is subject to strict timelines. If you are unable to respond within 72 hours, we may be limited in the ways that we can dispute this chargeback. After we receive and review any additional information, we can determine if we can take any further action. While we need to you respond quickly, a final decision about this chargeback may take up to 75 days. - If your PayPal account balance has become negative, please reimburse us within 60 days of the date of this email.
This transaction was reversed for the following reasons(s):
- We did not receive signed proof of delivery.
For further assistance, please log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page, or email our Chargeback Department at the email address below. Be sure to include your case ID number in the subject of the email.
PayPal Chargeback Department Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Fax: 402-537-5755 CB:PP-396-648-789:R4:USD900.00:01032008:9ET7904456341182W
PayPal Email ID PP800
6-15-08 Jim, I'm sending this in to clear my name with you. I'm sending this as proff that I no longer have Mary as a client and that she took back several of the payments made to me through pay pal and that I'm not involved in any kind of plott conspiracy with Mary or anyone against you and jan - I hope this will put an end to you thinking I'm part of any kind of attacks on you - we have had a few disagreements over the years but until now we have always worked them out and you know that attacking you on the internet is not my style - as always I remain here willing to discuss any of this with you at any time - sincerely mike
brief summary Mary prant came to me in sept of 2007 and stated that you and jan cheated her and she begged me to take her case and help her - M agreed to pay me $3200.00 + $ 100.00 for pay pal fees and cost totaling $3300.00 and I was to cast repetitive type love and disruption prayers on her B.F. hani in sept, oct, nov and dec of 2008 and weekly updated prayers were also cast every week for M case - the e mail below from mary was her promising to repay the two charge backs and the amount due if I would continue her case - then a short while later she again tried charging back the 1st $ 1500.00 made in sept 2007 through pay pal and also on the $300.00 she paid on march 5 2008 through pay pal which was so I'd do more work for her etc - it's been several times she promises top pay me if I'd work on her case again after she cheated me by filing charge backs with pay pal - and I took her back several times based on her saying she was sorry and that she promised to pay the full balance due plus all charges added by pay pal and I did more work on her case and then a few weeks later she'd get mad and try more charge backs all over again and she stopped payment on a check she sent me omn 4-10-08 - this was the last straw and I have had no contact with her since - I tried my best to help her but she continued filing charge backs against me and stopped payment on that check too - also in sept 2007 when she first came to me I refused to do the curses that she wanted me to do on you and jan as you know that is not the way I work and I told her we may not be getting alone now but we were friends for many years - and I explained that you were within your rights to drop her as she was so obsessive and clearly abused you and jan and your services - I'm always here to discuss this with you at any time and I hope you and jan can see that I'm not involved in any conspiracy with anyone against you - sincerely mike
$2000.00 BALANCE DUE AS OF MARCH 17 2008
THEN SINCE MARCH 17 2008 M FILED MORE CHARGE BACKS & STOPPED PAYMENT ON A CHECK TO ME $ 1500.00 CHARGE BACK ON 1ST PAYMENT MADE APROX SEPT 10 2007 $ 300.00 CHARGE BACK 3-5-2008 PAYMENT $ 200.00 CHECK 4-10-2008 M STOPPED PAYMENT ----- Original Message ----- From: Stanley Cahill To: Prant99@aol.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:25 AM Subject: Re: Payment Plan - What is owed?
mary I just finished building more dolls for your prayers to be continued - you can write another handwritten letter of request and request exactly what you want - and send it when you can send a payment toward the balance due I need to buy suppliers materials and offering to make up the alchemy's to continue casting these prayers for you - without these implements they are not very effective - I will expect and honest effort that you are making payments to me on a regular bases - also my pay pal account is frozen - all payments must be made by cashiers check or money order - I'm always here for you mary - sincerely mike
our original $3200.00 u.s.d was our original agreement in sept 2007 $ 100.00 u.s.d was added to help cover the fee pay pal charges and you agreed to that after the first payment ======== $3300.00 u.s.d - $1500.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal around sept 10 2007 ======== $ 1800.00 u.s.d. balance due - $ 900.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox oct 10 -15 2007 ======== $ 900.00 u.s.d balance due this was originally promised to be paid by nov 10th 2007 $ 450.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox noc 10-15 2007 ======= $ 450.00 u.s.d. bal due on or before dec 10 2007 + $900.00 u.s.d the oct 2007 payment wascharged back by you through pay pal aprox in nov of 2007 + $450.00 u.s.d. the nov 2007 payment charged back aprox late dec 2007 or early jan 2007 ======== $1800.00 u.s.d balance past due $ 500.00 u.s.d job payer done when you lost your job
======== $2300.00 u.s.d - $ 300.00 u.s.d paid by you to pay pal aprox 2 weeks ago 3-5-08 ======== $ 2000.00 u.s.d balance past due
also you agreed to pay the fee pay pal charged for the charge backs - there not that much 80 - 90 bucks they charged 29-30 bucks on the 450 - I'm blocked from even viewing that account in reality other than the $300.00 you just paid to pay pal considering the charge backs I haven't gotten anything from you since the first payment - yes I got the other two payments but pay pal is demanding their money and they have put a report against my credit because I actually owe them that money being you did the charge backs and the $300.00 did not come to me it went toward the amount I owe them plus the fees they added
if you have any questions you can call this evening as I'm doing a ritual most of today and I won't be able to talk thanks mike
----- Original Message ----- From: Prant99@aol.com To: email@example.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:12 AM Subject: Payment Plan - What is owed?
I do not wish to cheat you but I also concerned about the case. I want a reuniting and disruprion on all other people that interfere...for Hani to move back in and make a commitment to me leading to marriage...honestly where is the case ???
I need to make monthly payments to you.
You got $300 last week.
What is owed?
----- Original Message ----- From: Celeste Schaub To: Mike Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:41 PM Subject: hello
Just want to take a few minutes to go over what we talked about the other day, in reference to M P, your past client. I remember when you were working with her, and on the phone day and night for hours trying to calm her down, as I witnessed this more than once when I was down at your place doing spells together and even blooded on her spell while you were doing it along with my clients spells.
In November of 2007 she emailed me when she was involved with you still, and had Pay Pal take back the money she had sent you for these same spells (prayers) work I already described above. I am not sure of the amount but believe it was around $1, 800.00 for several different spells. Because the two of you were involved in the charge back she was doing with Pay Pal, she was asking me to do spell work for her. I declined doing anything for her for various reasons; one being she was already your client and I don't work with clients who are already engaged with another spell caster; two she wanted me to do spell work against Jim and Janhett (curses), as well as to get her boyfriend back. I got one more email from her the next day saying she really needed this work done, almost begging me to take her on as a new client. I again wrote her back, she wanted me to call her, and stated the same to her again and forwarded you the emails she sent me, along with my responses. The next thing I knew she was sending me emails she was sending to Jim and Janhett, that had been cc'd to you and me, implying you and I were involved in some sort of conspiracy "to get Jim and Janhett". This never was as you know and I had to finally block her emails, but I was informed from a client of mine at the time that she was suppose to have told Jim that she flew down to meet you and I...how preposterous, I never even talked to this woman, or saw her before in my life, too much drama for me. I told her Jim and I were having enough problems trying to work out our divorce with everyone else interfering and I wasn't getting involved in any of this bs. But yes she definitely did contract you for spell work, and I was there for at least two of the spells myself. I told her, her problems with Jim and Janhett were hers to work out and not to involve me. I told her you were in my opinion, which I still feel today, the best person to work with her for spell work as you were always completely dedicated to your clients and do things as Divinity dictates. You always answer the telephone and emails no matter when they come in. Your honesty and integrity is of the highest qualifications I know. Hope this further clarifies our discussion the other night. Take care,
Your friend and fellow magician,
Mary Prantil Scamming Yet Another Magick Site She Claims Not To Know.
Set the record straight, huh ?. Well I will set the record straight for you in this post ok ?. Ok Viewers, lets look at what Mary T. Prantil attempted to do to us on top of what she's done to these other sites in question. Please see the articles below outlining Prantil's negative scam plot that went horrible wrong with Miss Windglows Pay Pal account, You will further see the pattern unfolding in the Prantil scam routine.
Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.
Matilda the Psychic writes to Jan : "I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cursed and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1, 000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic, not something simple.
Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married, she said "No, not my H".
Well she begged me ( begged Matilda the psychic NOT Jan ) so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for $500.00.
I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she "was no angel" with Jan's service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tried to claim that the "merchandise" was not the quality that she expected. Spell work is NOT merchandise because it is SPIRITUAL in nature and therefore not tangible.
I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service." ( Direct email quote from Psychic Matilda to Jan )
HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL. The invoice was initially sent to Prantil ( numerous times because her credit card would not go through for the charge ) and the invoice was never paid by Prantil. She sent a signed personal check through regular first class mail for her spell services, then once her castings were completed and she messed up her relationship with her now ex, she then tried to go into Pay Pal and put money on the open invoice to which Jan promptly cancelled the invoice before Prantil had a chance. Everything was explained to Prantil and she clearly understood that there would be no refunds because once a spell is cast it is a done deal.
Mary Prantil tried to mess up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoice after her personal check that was written to Jan cleared so that she could force Jan to give her a refund anyway despite what she had already been told and had agreed to regarding payment, the casting, no refunds, etc. until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoice.
Again, Jan caught on to what Prantil was getting ready to do which was to rip Jan off, so Jan cancelled the invoice from Prantil. Prantil then became so angry she reported Jim Morgan to Pay Pal and it was not even Mr. Morgan's Pay Pal account. What Prantil did at the point that she realized that she could not charge back on the open invoice that Prantil never paid but was getting ready to put funds on so she COULD charge back and force a refund anyway, Prantil then in anger wrote a complaint to Pay Pal and placed a claim of Fraud against Jim Morgan on this account, again which was not even his.
Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have anything to do with the administrative functions of this company such as receiving monies for anything especially spell work. Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to other then helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get paid for.
See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.
-----Original Message----- From: m prantil To: firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm Subject: Invoice From James Morgan
I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Love lust and Blood spells.
I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by him.
HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part. Mary Prantil in her ignorance thought that just because Jan had sent her an invoice that she had NOT paid, that she still had money on THAT open invoice, LOL. ( isn't that like thinking you still have money in the bank as long as you still have checks, LOL????) ** NOTE** if ANYONE would like to see the original invoice record that was cancelled by Jan, then write and we will forward it to you to show that we are telling the entire truth about Mary's little Pay Pal temper tantrum.
Forwarded Message: Subj: STOP BOTHERING US Date: 6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Passionspells To: Prant99
your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____ as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him nasty e-mails, etc.
We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet Law.
In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.
In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail stating that:
6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time From: Prant99
Reply To: To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2
I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America check.
-----Original Message----- From: Passionspells@aol.com To: Prant99@aol.com Sent: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm Subject: Verification Needed
This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your method of payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?
I am going through all of my client records doing verification, etc. for my records.
Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.
Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence in that matter.
From: Janhett T. Windglows
To: Mary Prantil (email@example.com)
$1, 250.54 USD Status: Pending Date Requested: May 6, 2007
Spells Invoice Invoice Janhett T. Windglows firstname.lastname@example.org
Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount 1 050607 30 Day Spells Package For Mary 1, 200.00 1, 200.00 T Subtotal: 1, 200.00 Shipping: 46.80 T
T = 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74 Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD) Total: $1, 250.54 USD
Janhett T. Windglows To: Mary Prantil (email@example.com)
$500.00 USD Status: Pending Date Requested: May 8, 2007
Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one thanks dear
From: Janhett T. Windglows To:
Mary Prantil (firstname.lastname@example.org)
$500.00 USD Status: Pending Date Requested: May 8, 2007
In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not, that is no longer our problem.
HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT HER LOL.
Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony
Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Prant99 To: Wizardmorgan2 CC: Passionspells
Jim, (and Jan)
H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- - - - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I was upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by 11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - - - - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - - and the email.
T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- - - - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2 spells.
Let me know.
HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.
Subj: ABUSE Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Passionspells To: email@example.com
I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to send us more mail under different e-mail addresses.
Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the following e-mail addresses:
I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone number.
I really do need this abuse from her to stop.
My other screen name is firstname.lastname@example.org
in which she has also been blocked from.
THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY.
AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND FURTHER
REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER
$1, 200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER SHE
DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.
Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last phase... Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Prant99 To: Wizardmorgan2 CC: Passionspells
Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again "reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes. I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please !!
I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so pure and high. I do not want you to send me back any money.
I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me, , , that he can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so sexually frusterated without me...who ever he fucks or has a one night stand or bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the office.
Are you still willing to help me?
I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you then I can send the $250 today.
Mary the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let go...
THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .
OUR RESPONSE BACK TO MARY PRANTIL:
Due to your ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided
counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed
Matilda not to have any further communications with you.
After I send this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you either.
Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim is finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????
I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us, because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.
HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.
JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters, and re casts also.
WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.
CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.
GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN ALL MY YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.
MARY T. PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Criminal Check for all Mary T Prantil in the state of CA Record 1 of 6
IDENTIFICATION Mary T Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
CASE NUMBER: M598531 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 03/23/1990 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 2 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T105836 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 11/13/1992 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 3 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T108343 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE: 01/04/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 4 of 6
IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T110326 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 02/02/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 5 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T120948 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 08/09/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 6 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: M695524 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 02/01/1995 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
MATTER DISBARRMENT FRANK G. PRANTIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L. Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351, 1989.SCT.45677
November 27, 1989
IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL
For earlier order herein, see Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of Fair Oaks, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having suspended the said Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;
It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
On trial before the bar court in San Francisco, FRANK PRANTIL [#35155], 67, of Sacramento is charged with multiple counts of failing to perform legal services competently. Prantil was disbarred in 1989, reinstated in 1994 and charged with misconduct in 2002. The trial on the new charges was ongoing at press time and although the bar had not formally asked for his disbarment, it is a possible penalty.
The 1989 disbarment was the result of convictions for forgery and being an accessory to possess cocaine.
In a case two miles across town at the State Bar offices on Howard Street -- and at the other end of the world of privilege -- 67-year-old defense attorney Frank Prantil is facing a task he's already performed numerous times -- defending himself against accusations that he's acted unethically as an attorney. In 1979, Prantil was suspended from practicing law after he was accused of improperly representing a client. While on probation, Prantil was alleged to have participated in a check-fraud scheme. He was convicted of forgery and disbarred, according to the California Supreme Court opinion confirming Prantil's disbarment.
Prantil later took advantage of California rules that allow disbarred attorneys to ask for reinstatement after five years. Prantil successfully argued that he had rehabilitated himself, and resumed practice in 1994.
Prantil is now facing State Bar disciplinary charges, which could potentially get him disbarred again, alleging that he failed to competently defend a client, then improperly charged the client for his services.
Prantil's case, along with three cases decided earlier this year in which California attorneys were disbarred for a second time, has added steam to a nine-year-old bureaucratic proposal to give judges the option of disbarring the worst attorneys for life.
In California, there now exists no legal concept of permanent disbarment. A State Bar committee on Nov. 15 will consider the possibility of changing that, if only slightly. Rather than making all disbarments permanent, it would extend from five to seven years the amount of time disbarred attorneys would have to wait before requesting to be reinstated, and would give judges the option of forever banishing the worst of California's worst attorneys.
The fact that it's taken nine years for such a mild proposal to reach this preliminary step hints at a lack of seriousness the California legal establishment lobby applies to abuses by its own members.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank G. PRANTIL, Defendant-Appellant. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
June 25, 1985
764 F.2d 548
Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.
Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
1 The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001; and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. All of the defendant's convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed the misprision of a felony count before the trial began. On appeal, the defendant raises a host of issues which, for the most part, we need not address. Three of the defendant's challenges, however, require reversal of the defendant's convictions for the reasons explained herein.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2 The defendant was retained by Ronald Powell to represent his wife, Betty Lou Powell, and her son in a federal criminal prosecution on various drug-related charges.1 Mr. Powell had been a previous client of the defendant in unrelated criminal proceedings. After Mrs. Powell and her son were arrested at the Powell residence on April 23, 1982 in connection with the narcotics charges, Mr. Powell, who was also named in the felony arrest warrant, remained a fugitive until his apprehension on August 10, 1982. On the day of his wife's arrest, Mr. Powell telephoned the defendant, Frank Prantil, and retained his services for the criminal proceedings against his immediate family. Throughout Mr. Powell's fugitive status, the defendant periodically telephoned Mr. Powell and met him on at least two occasions.
3 During their first meeting after the incarceration of Mrs. Powell, Mr. Powell presented the defendant with a partial payment of the retainer agreement and directed the defendant to the whereabouts of other sources of cash in various bank accounts and at the Powell residence. Mrs. Powell, unable to make a $750, 000 bond, remained incarcerated until the completion of her criminal trial. She gave the defendant the power of attorney to collect the funds from the various bank accounts. The defendant also retrieved a substantial sum of money from a floor safe at the Powell residence that had been overlooked at the time of the Powell family arrest. Although questions over the capacity in which Mr. Prantil retained custody of these monies (as attorney fees or in bailment for Mrs. Powell) occupied a substantial portion of the defendant's trial, we need not parse the evidence on this subject here. Pursuant to the retainer agreement negotiated by Mr. Powell, the defendant represented Mrs. Powell for the duration of her criminal trial. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder.
4 Mr. Prantil succeeded in obtaining an acquittal on all but four of the fifteen criminal counts leveled against his client Mrs. Powell. During the course of his representation of Mrs. Powell, the defendant also sent his sister-in-law, Malvina Schmidt, to meet the fugitive Ronald Powell for reasons not relevant here. Within the same time frame, the defendant, on several occasions, acted as the conduit for negotiations between the fugitive Ronald Powell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gorder for Mr. Powell's surrender. During the period when Mr. Powell was a fugitive, the defendant was summoned before a grand jury and questioned by Mr. Gorder concerning his contacts and relationship with Mr. Powell. Three of the defendant's five perjury convictions rest on responses he made to Mr. Gorder's grand jury examination. The remaining two perjury charges and the two false statement counts stem from the events surrounding the defendant's efforts to obtain Mrs. Powell's release on bond pending the appeal from her criminal conviction. For purposes of this appeal, however, we need only discuss the evidence presented on one perjury count.
5 One of the defendant's perjury convictions rests on grand jury testimony the defendant gave under questioning by Mr. Gorder regarding a trip to Omaha, Nebraska. In his testimony the defendant stated that he was picked up by a blonde woman at his hotel in Omaha, Nebraska who took him to meet Mr. Powell and then transported the defendant to the airport. The defendant further testified that he did not know the identity of this woman. At trial the government contended that the defendant committed perjury when he denied knowing the name of this woman.
6 Under the government's theory, the defendant falsely denied knowing the identity of this blonde woman in order to protect the woman from the grand jury's investigation. The government unsuccessfully sought to prove that the blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel was Malvina Schmidt, the defendant's sister-in-law. The evidence at trial revealed that although the defendant had been met and transported to a different airport by a blonde woman on a different occasion, no one picked up the defendant at his Omaha hotel. The evidence did demonstrate that the defendant eventually met his sister-in-law at a restaurant in the Omaha area. Accordingly, on appeal the government has shifted its perjury allegation by recasting the defendant's denial of knowledge about the name of the blonde woman who met him at his hotel into a denial of "knowing who was with [Mr.] Powell in the Omaha area." In response, the defendant claims his conviction should be reversed because the identity of the woman whom he incorrectly recalled to have met at his Omaha hotel is immaterial to any matters then before the grand jury and thus not perjurious.
II. ISSUES ON APPEAL
7 The defendant has raised several challenges to his convictions on appeal. We reach only three of his challenges. The defendant's first allegation of error involves the refusal of the trial court to grant a pretrial motion to have the prosecutor, Mr. Gorder, recused from the case so that the defendant could call Mr. Gorder as a witness. The defendant also claims that the prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper argument during closing argument and the defendant was thereby prejudiced. The final contention of error challenges the materiality of the defendant's allegedly perjurious statements regarding the blonde woman at the Omaha airport.
8 The defendant has also raised a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as to counts seven and eight of the indictment which charged the defendant with violations of the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001. In essence, the government presented evidence that the defendant attempted to secure the release of his client Betty Powell through the submission of an appeal bond form that the defendant knew was not authorized by the named bond company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution we find the evidence presented sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Nonetheless, for the reasons discussed in the balance of the opinion, we reverse the defendant's convictions on these and the other counts of the indictment.
A. The Propriety of a Prosecuting Witness
9 The prosecutor in this case, Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder, was also the prosecutor in the previous trial of Betty Powell. Mr. Gorder not only opposed the defendant in that trial but also conducted the examination of the defendant in both the grand jury and bond proceedings that are the subject of defendant's perjury convictions in this case. Mr. Gorder was also involved in the discussions with the bond agency as to the adequacy of Mrs. Powell's bond collateral which gave rise to the defendant's false statement convictions. Finally, on several occasions Mr. Gorder negotiated directly with the defendant for the surrender of Ronald Powell, the fugitive whom the defendant was accused of harboring and giving aid. Thus, although he never took the stand, Mr. Gorder was a witness to, and indeed a participant in, some aspect of all of the events alleged in the indictment.
10 The defendant was charged and convicted of being an accessory after the fact to Mr. Powell's criminal offenses in that the defendant did "receive, relieve, comfort and assist Ronald Lee Powell in order to hinder and prevent his apprehension, trial and punishment, " in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. During trial the principal defense asserted by the defendant to this count, and the harboring a fugitive charge, revolved around the defendant's efforts to successfully negotiate Mr. Powell's surrender with Mr. Gorder. Rather than harboring or assisting Mr. Powell, the defendant contended he was actively conducting the ongoing negotiations for Mr. Powell's timely surrender through direct communications with both Mr. Gorder and Mr. Powell. Obviously, this defense hinges substantially on the availability of evidence detailing the defendant's role in these surrender negotiations.
11 Both before and during the trial defense counsel unsuccessfully moved the court to recuse the prosecutor to enable the defense to call him as a witness. After final argument the defendant moved for a mistrial because the prosecutor's remarks "reaffirm[ed] Mr. Gorder's role as a witness in the case without cross-examination, because they appeared to be, in the way that they were framed, assertions of personal knowledge based on his dealings with Mr. Prantil." At every juncture, the prosecutor refused either to recuse himself or to testify. The trial court declined to disturb the prosecutor's decision and denied, without comment, all of the defendant's motions on this matter.
12 The prosecutor defended his decision, and the trial court concurred, on the grounds that his testimony was unnecessary and cumulative to the defendant's case. We recognize that a defendant has an obligation to exhaust other available sources of evidence before a court should sustain a defendant's efforts to call a participating prosecutor as a witness. United States v. West, 680 F.2d 652, 654 (9th Cir.1982). Nonetheless, the defendant's obligation to resort to alternative means of adducing factual testimony is not absolute. Both the quality and quantity of the alternate sources of evidence are proper subjects for comparison with that sought directly from the participating prosecutor. For example, in this case the prosecutor contends that his testimony on the defendant's efforts to arrange for the surrender of the fugitive Ron Powell was unnecessary and cumulative.
Previous address Locations & Criminal Records Of Mary T. Prantil:
3285 33rd St, Astoria, NY 11106 Reported:12/01/2002
251 32nd St, New York, NY 10016 Reported:07/18/2001
3285 33 Wusd # 69, Astoria, NY 11106 Reported:06/01/2001
3044 1st Ave, San Diego, CA 92103 Reported:11/13/2000
1352 PO Box, New York, NY 10150 Reported:06/18/1997
3044 Juniper St # 2, San Diego, CA 92104 Reported:10/01/1995
1154 22nd # 2, San Diego, CA 92102 Reported:12/01/1993
319 Gravilla St, La Jolla, CA 92037 Reported:08/01/1992
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006
Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: M695524
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006
Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T105836
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006
Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T108343
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006
Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T110326
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006
Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T120948
Criminal Court Records
Name: PRANTIL, MARY T Case Number: M598531 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 03/23/1990
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: M695524 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 02/01/1995
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T105836 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 11/13/1992
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T108343 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 01/04/1993
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T110326 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 02/02/1993
Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T120948 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 08/09/1993
Bankruptcies, Tax Liens & Judgments by Name for: Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: PO BOX 1352, NEW YORK NY 10150
Action: STATE TAX LIEN Court: SACRAMENTO COUNTY COURT (RD) Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case: 9706100302 (06/10/1997) Liability/Assests: $1,310.00/NA
Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016
Action: BANKRUPTCY Court: NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County) Case: 9640110 (01/11/1996) Liability/Assests: NA/NA
Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016
Action: BANKRUPTCY Court: NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County) Plaintiff: PRO SE Case: 9640110 (01/11/1996) Liability/Assests: NA/NA
Judgement Against Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 3038 DICKENS ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92106 Action: SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT Court: KEARNEY MESA MUNI - SAN DIEGO CO Plaintiff: LIBS CHIROPRACTOR CENTER Case: 570215 (12/19/1991) Liability/Assests: $2,198.00/NA
Mary T. Prantil's Contact Information: WARNING !!! DO NOT GIVE HER YOUR PHONE # OR EMAIL ADDRESS !!! ( you will REGRET it !!!! )
From: Michael Jenkins <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org Sent: Mon, August 23, 2010 3:18:01 PM Subject: Information for Mary Prantel
To whom this may concern;
This letter concerns Ms. Mary T Prantil of Astoria New York.
My name is Michael Jenkins owner of www.lovespells-magicspells.com and www.extremeblackmagic.com. My contact information is as follows: 801 W. Bay Drive Suite 471 Largo, Florida 33770 phone number is 1-727-216-9750. I will be more than happy to assist anyone that may be reading this in any kind of questions that he/she may have.
Please forgive me lack of specific dates as I deal with many people and this situation with her has been going on for quite some time. Ms. Prantil first contacted me for spell work in 2007 I believe, but it may have been 2006, as I am not for sure. During her first contact she made with me she had asked me to do a spell for her and at the time I was rather busy and told her that it would be quite some time before I would be able to help her. Because of this she did not call me back about the spell. She did in fact go with another spell caster, Jan Windglows.
A few months later I noticed reports on rip off report about myself, Mrs. Windglows and Mr. Morgan. I am unsure of what this was about as I personally had done nothing to her and have had no dealings with her. I went on the site to defend this point and she constantly kept putting more and more reports about myself, Mr. and Mrs. Morgan.
Later she started to e-mail me MANY, and when I say many I mean 10 to 15 e-mails a day. In these e-mails she would say that I was a scam, Jim was a scam, and Janett was a scam, ect. She would also go on to say how she was going to call the feds and put them in jail and she was going to put me in jail. She also would go on to slander us continually for no reason on ror. Next she started calling my phone continually. At first I did not answer the phone calls and I had saw what she had done and did not want to speak with her as I figured her as a crazy person. Because of this I didn't care to have any dealings of any kind. After about the 130th call in a row I finally had to answer as she was disrupting my business because no one else could call in. In the conversation she stated that she had wanted me to perform a spell against Jim and Janet and that I would be taken care of. I took this to mean that she would not be posting any more false reports about me. Basically extortion and black mail. Of course I told her "NO" and that I would be contacting Mr. and Mrs. Morgan about the phone conversation. I hung up and the calls kept coming. It was months before she finally stopped calling. I kept the phone conversations that she would leave on my voice mail and gave them to Mr. and Mrs. Morgan for their records. Once the conversations were posted on the net she finally quit calling because she realized that I was given the recording to them.
I have also noticed on Rip Off Report that she has posted under many different names tring to make it look like she is someone else. She's deceiving people and tricking them into believing their are many dissatisfied customers from my services. That is not the only site that she is posting on either.
Through the course of the last few years I have suffered because of her negative slander and libel she has on the net. The most important part is that she will not quit. She keeps going up on different sites and posting more and more reports. Let me first remind you that I NEVER DID ANY WORK FOR HER WHAT SO EVER! So this type of abuse she has posted is absolutely uncalled for.
She has also made talk about in conversations about Janet dyeing. She doesn't mention exactly how, but the conversation is lead to believe that she would do something to harm Janet her self.
My experience with Ms. Prantel has been a horrifying one not only to myself and the stress she has put on my business and person life, but the stress she has placed on myself personally because of these negative reports that she keeps posting. In all honesty all you need do is read the reports that she has online and you will see the things for yourself. Its very clear what her intentions are as she states them. She wants to kill our business and in some statements ourselves.
Ms. Prantel has a very violent history and also a history of doing this to many other people that have had the displeasure to meet her. Please do something to stop this individual that is personally a menace to society!
Thanks, Michael Jenkins 1-727-216-9750
scamming businesses business scam Mary T. Prantil scams on-line businesses most hated internet scam artist most hated person new York Mary T. Prantil mary prantil Astoria new York NEW YORK Astoria N.Y Queens New York Criminal Records Scammers scammer scam scams Internet scams Internet con artist con artist on the internet scam artist scam artists artist that scam scam forums complaint forums post your complaint rip off report reports of rip offs cyber crime Manhattan n.y post your comment remove a report remove a rip off report I've been scammed gripe sites post a gripe rebuttal rebuttals write a report Internet terrorist Internet terrorism Internet scammers internet scam artist were you scammed don't get scammed have you been scammed scam in N.Y new York scams scamming in new York con games con gamer confidence games cyber criminal mary prantil drug addicts drug addict drug abuser abusers crack cocaine Scam Artist Exposed I Witnesses & Evidence CURSE SPELL/TAPES More Evidence & Links Mary T. Prantil SCAM ARTIST EXPOSED Consumer's Rage Complaints no customer service Criminal Extortionist Complaints Board Law Civil Rights Internet Hacker Complaints Bankruptcy Law Consumer complaints Lottery – UK Scam Domain 419 Scam Advance Fee Fake Lottery Scam Phone Directory Rip-off Report Mary T Prantil AKA Honest Person Marc Christmas Thief Forums Mary Stuart Yahoo gypsy scam gypsy scum New York Criminal Lawyer Blog Prosecutor Nigerian Dating Scam Record Registry Public Records Arrest Records Sex Offenders Scam e mails credit-card department economy news facebook financial financial-planner financial-planning Forex Scam Internet Internet-security ira Lionheart Group Lionheart Group Scam Lionheart Scam Monday money news office paste-the-code paypal scams personal planning police public retirement retirement-planning Retirement News roth Scam Scams search security sheriff state The Lionheart Group time Economy America aol Article Marketing Article Snatch News Broadband cellular telephone China Delaware e - commerce ebay Eric Schmidt Europe google India Internet Internet-marketing Internet users Matt Cutts Microsoft New York online advertising search-engine-optimization search-results Search Engine search engines Search marketers search marketing search marketing news SEO Articles social-media social network The New York Times tweets twitter United Kingdom United States USD FACEBOOK Writing Articles yahoo you tube EXPOSES APEX CYBER STALKER MARY PRANTIL Mary T Prantil APEX Cyber Stalker Criminal Internet Terrorist Mary T Prantil APEX Cyber Stalker Indian Consumer Complaints Forum Shopping Karma Cultural Rip-off Report Public Warning All Online and Land Based Businesses Beware of Mary T Prantil IT ALL STARTED WITH A PSYCHIC READING Rip-off Report Honest Person evil psychic Marc AKA Enforcer Consumer's Rage Ripoff Report Mary Theresa Prantil Microsoft windows Live Board Lottery Complaints People Search Facebook Twitter My space Youtube Craigslist Profiles mary prantil's blog mary prantil blogs blogging Rumors Hip Hop Rumors Gay Teen Utter Disgrace Criminal Liar Mary Prantil 3285 33rd 3285 33rd St Ripoff Report Mary Internet Mary Scam Artist True Scam Artist Consumer Complaint Search Results St Astoria Ny Apex Cyber Criminal Astoria Ny 11106 Email Address Phone 33rd St Astoria Mary Prantil Linkedin Complaint Search Results Prantil Mary Theresa Ripoff Report Scam Unauthorized Internet Terrorist Prantil Exposes Apex Criminal Attorney Father Communications Manager Manager Phone Criminal Attorney Scam Artist Mary Consumer Complaint Site Expert Sport Beg Exposes Apex Cyber Artist Tagged Scam Artist Client Community Diigo Groups Online Consumer Complaint Mary Theresa Praintil Liar Criminal Mary Client Who Rips off sites Cyber Criminal Mary Scam Unauthorized Charges Test Takers Mary Lee Lionheart Group News Llama Lifestyle Marketing Llamas Box 595 Criminal Records Honest Marc Incorporation Complaints Lottery Defective Product Poor Charges Rip Off Lifestyle Marketing Association Attorney Father's Footsteps Auburn Community Calendar Being Scammed Apex Internet Scam Jail Complaints New Study Finds Newspaper Media Cnn Mary Theresa Nut Case Hbo Cnn Prantil Apex Cyber Astoria New York Anderson 360 Expose Hacking Extortion Prantil Complaints Mary Prantil Complaints Scam Prantil Criminal Records Prantil Honest Person Prantil Internet Criminal Prantil Liar Criminal Apex Cyber Stalker Nyc Complaints Case computers desktop computers smartphones Phone Hacker Prantil Psycho Nut Prantil San Diego SKYPE Slandering Innocent Business Slandering Innocent Extortionist Needs Jail Frank Mary Prantil Terrorist Extortionist Internet Criminal Crimes Scam Artist Internet Terrorist Exposed Unauthorized Charges Rip Jail Complaints Yahoo Incorporation Complaints Linkedin Member Directory Gold Cross Ceu Test Latimer County Lifestyle Marketing Association Canada Llama Lifestyle Marketing Association prantil Expose Hacking Phone Numbers Prantil 3285 33rd St Marketing Association Canada Mary Lee Pence Mary T Prantil APEX Cyber Stalker APEX Cyber Stalker Rothman Corporation EXPOSES APEX CYBER STALKER MARY PRANTIL My Account Urgent need to ban porn websites Chief Justice of India CYBER STALKING 網誌 viceroy 台灣英語網 2 0 beta Usenet nl Court jails rapistIndian Consumer Complaints Forum Karma KARMA IS REAL Cultural Vision The Register RSS Archive Page 3 Apex Community Forums Abstracts Database National Criminal Justice Reference Service Apex court judge judiciary CheatCodes Video Games DevelopedUnsolicited Emails English NA Forums Find a sex offender Cyber War and Terrorism hacking into my bank account Download free cyber crime News Slumdog Cyber Stalker Lost and Found in Cyberspace Informational Privacy Media Law Project Life PDF Information Technology and Development Cyberspace ARSCC NCHRA blog GDA KOYAL ENCLAVE Complaints refund not received Long Beach Police Officer Charged with StalkingCYBER STALKING 網誌 viceroy 台灣英語網2 0 beta FairySales Invaderz Must Die Remix VGRecordsCheatsMagazine Cheats Cheat Codes Cheat gamecheats Cheats All Blog Posts Cyber Crime Law in IndiaNewsletter Archive Cyber Crime Information System for Cyberethics Awareness Criminal Complaint and Affidavit LAW Bureau of Police Research and Development MEDIA LAW LAW RESOURCE INDIA Quick News RADIO CANADA VE7KFM Camping survival Index Fiction Publishers Weekly Fiction Reviews India Current Affairs Legal issues Archive Call Of Duty Boards Forum Community MySpace internet news Earthquake MySpace Blog CORRECT THE RECORD Mary Prantil Prantil Wanna Be Stand Up Comic mary prantil bestmaryprantil twitter THIS IS A REAL COMPLAINT I am a male from Houston Texas