Celebrities Imprisoning Cyber
Bullies & Violent Stalkers
Experts advise against
feeding the "Blog Troll", but this isn't as easy to do as it might seem. No
matter what you call these low lives be it "Cyber Troll", "Blog Troll", "Cyber
Stalker", "Cyber Bully", "Cyber Criminal" etc. , they enjoy their work and will
attack you no matter the strategy you use because their the new breed of
Internet Terrorist.
One thing In common that
all these degrees of criminal personality share in common outside of a diverse
range of psychological issues, would be that they all feed, or pray off of
society in one way or another. They're all pity and influence peddlers whom
absolutely hate rejection and reject authority in whatever form it takes.
They all see themselves as
"the victim" even though their the aggressors initiate and instigate harassment
against their victims 100% of the time. Of course, let's keep in mind that were
speaking in regards to several types of personalities over all that more or less
have common shared personality qualities etc.
Their perceptions of
reality no matter how twisted they are would be the only view that counts as far
as their concerned. In other words, the whole world is wrong and they are
correct, in essence. To disagree with this sort of criminal on any level is only
asking for problems, or prolonged harassment geared to destroy your reputation.
Most stalking activities
like Mary Prantil's basically have to do with either sexual conquest, or the
complete and utter domination over others by whatever means. Typically both
behaviors are in play in most cases, from what I understand coming from most
experts in the matter.
Rejection of the Mary
Prantil personality on any level is also another way to cause retaliation or
attacks coming from folks of this nature. Rejection to business propositions,
rejection of a case, rejection of a ideology or worse, rejection to their
unwanted advances of love can be a act of war as far as the stalker is
concerned.
Again, and from what's
I've read coming from various experts in the field, The stalkers justify their
actions and label themselves as : "victims" on the grounds of this rejection, or
some small imagined slight to which is self-inflicted by the stalker and
moreover something the victim is completely unaware of as a rule of thumb.
The stalker usually
refuses to take any responsibility for anything they might have said or done to
alienate another, or that might have ended a relationship be it of a personal or
business level. You can see this reflected in the Mary Prantil postings often,
if not always.
Denial, refusal to be held
accountable, lying and constant wild accusations of fraud, hacking, spamming
etc. run rampant in her numerous postings over the Internet.
If a stalker believes
themselves to be in the right due to their distorted beliefs and or, demented
value system, they will not only make numerous unjustified attacks against
others but will also attempt to enlist the aid of yet others to engage in the
stalking process with them.
Again, as can be seen
frequently in Mary Prantil's postings on various scam forum sites and her
Twitter pages. Of course, folks are smart enough to see through her deception
and further reject her request for their involvement, to which infuriates
her.
These personalities will
often habitually lie against their targets by painting them in the most negative
light possible in order to sway public sentiment in their favor and against the
innocent person or persons. In our case, Prantil has said about every negative
thing a human being can say about another in a effort to destroy sever
reputations and businesses on the Internet.
In Prantil's mass spamming
of her trash postings against us, you can clearly see that none of her charges
amount to anything past being very nasty and misleading over all.
Especially, to someone who
may not understand the entire situation, or in what's going on with it
currently. This is what this stalker depends on primarily. The ignorance of the
consumer regarding the entire matter or situation and this is why she tries to
post as much as she can in places on the web that were not aware of most of the
time.
In other words, she wants
people to view her deceptive and untruthful side of the story only to generate a
negative response against the victim. In the instance of Prantil, her lover
rejected her in the end as a result of her horrific behavior. Her case was
rejected with us as a result of her horrible and repetitive behavioral
activities.
Her family, employers,
co-workers and what few friends she managed to make, all rejected her for the
same repetitive negative behaviors. Basically, these types of criminal
personalities have no will power, no self-control, lacking any self esteem, no
real goals or dreams of their own past a few pipe dreams that quickly vanish.
You can see this in the
personalities Prantil creates for herself such as being a dancer, comedian,
assistant to a CEO, a lobbyist, evangelist or her latest attempt in pretending
to be a on line Psychic who will lead everyone to God should they come into her
for a psychic reading.
You can see this on Rip
Off Report where she is pretending to be three people speaking to a ROR EDITOR
by the name of "Ramjet". This user Ramjet is a very negative person in
themselves and gave Prantil a dose of her own medicine when she started
associating herself with Edgar Casey.
The strange thing about
Prantil and most other stalkers of her similar disposition is in that they all
exhibit a relenting and or, deeply penetrating insecurity despite all the
egotistical boasting they put out as a diversionary tactic to the public.
Most stalkers like Prantil
don't feel that they can do any better in life, or that they must ride of the
accomplishments of others so they can make a valid contribution to society, or
be noticed in life by those around them.
One of the key problems
that really trip Prantil personality types up is in their alcohol and drug abuse
problems that they typically incur and suffer with.
However, riding on the
reputations of others doesn't work out for the stalker most of the time as it
didn't for Prantil. Why? Because most intelligent people see what a person like
this is trying to accomplish and just don't buy into the stalkers tactics and
thus, shun them as a result.
Some stalkers attempt to
destroy a person's name simply so they can either re-assume that individuals
identity once their out of the picture, or be the person that brought down a
certain entertainer, or political person such as in the case of Robert F. Kennedy and Sirhan Bishara Sirhan.
The assassin will be
loathed, hated and despised for as long as his name is remembered for the deed
he carried out against a innocent and beloved man yet, his name is
still synonymous with the name Kennedy unfortunately.
==========================================================
The published Rorschach (Kaiser, 1970)
of Sirhan Sirhan, the man who assassinated presidential aspirant Robert F.
Kennedy .
http://www.biomedexperts.com/Abstract.bme/1613657/Revisiting_the_Rorschach_of_Sirhan_Sirhan
In contrast to the defense experts at trial who
diagnosed paranoid schizophrenia, the data suggest a depressed and suicidal
individual organized at a borderline level of personality. Character pathology
is hysterical, paranoid, and dependent. When the Rorschach findings are compared
to the development history of Sirhan and the behavior around the time of the
assassination, the data are somewhat consistent with the theme of psychic
trauma, are very consistent with the theme of recurrent loss and pathological
mourning, and validate a characterological distrust and hatred of, yet
hysterical dependence on, the object world.
Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kennedy_assassination
Psychological Profile Of Mark David
Chapman
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/terrorists_spies/assassins/chapman/10.html
Their diagnoses all differed, but six were prepared
to testify for the defense that Chapman was psychotic. The prosecution had three
who said his delusions were short of the definition of psychosis.
In January 1981, what Chapman believed was a
brilliant idea occurred to him. He would use the trial to promote The Catcher
in the Rye. He told psychologist Milton Kline, "Everybody's going to
be reading this book with the help of the God-almighty media. They'll have to
come out with a deluxe edition!"
He planned to sit reading the book during his trial
and from time to time jump up and shout, "Read The Catcher in the Rye!
Read The Catcher in the Rye!'" He eagerly autographed copies of the book
that his guards brought to him.
The Life Of John Lennon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lennon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Death Rebecca
Schaeffer
In 1989, Robert John Bardo killed the young TV
actress he was stalking, Rebecca Schaeffer, co-star of “My Sister
Sam.”
“The one consistent thing we find in the minds and
the actions of celebrity stalkers is that these are individuals who create their
own reality,” former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt told NBC.
And sometimes, when they are finally rejected,
stalkers can turn violent.http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24425310/
Criminal Profile
& Story Of Robert John Bardo
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/psychology/stalkers/1.html
=================================================================
Hinckley became
obsessed with actress Jodie Foster’
John Hinckley
became obsessed with actress Jodie Foster’s performance in “Taxi Driver” and
began stalking her. When he failed in his attempts to win her affections, in
1981 he shot and nearly killed President Ronald Reagan because he thought it
would get her attention.http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24425310/
Criminal Profile
& Story Of John Hinckley
http://www.dcbar.org/for_lawyers/resources/legends_in_the_law/adelman.cfm
=====================================================================
Masahiko Shizawa, a Japanese national, was deported after
stalking Britney Spears
Others resort to
different strategies. Masahiko Shizawa, a Japanese national, was deported after
stalking Britney Spears by using such ploys as sending her sex toys in the mail.
Shizawa hasn’t given up, though — he’s suing Spears because, he claims, her
bodyguards caused him emotional distress.
Ambrose Kappos stalked singer Sheryl Crow, sneaking
backstage to meet her and calling her his “spiritual twin.”http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24425310/
Criminal Profile
& Story Of Masahiko Shizawa
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2693199.stm
===================================================================
Dante
Michael Soiu, was convicted of stalking actress Gwyneth
In 2000, a pizza delivery man, Dante Michael Soiu,
was convicted of stalking actress Gwyneth Paltrow. Like many stalkers, he tried
to reach her by going to the home of her parents.
Criminal Profile & Story Of Dante Michael Soiu
http://www.stephenmichaud.com/Whisper_Excerpt.htm
======================================================================
Zack Sinclair was
sentenced to three years in prison for stalking Mel
Gibson
Zack Sinclair was sentenced to three years in prison
for stalking Mel Gibson. Sinclair had claimed that God told him to pray with
Gibson, and that’s all he was trying to do. http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/24425310/
Criminal Profile & Story Of Zack Sinclair
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/08/entertainment/main678826.shtml
Stalkers:
The Psychological Terrorist
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/psychology/stalkers/5.html
-
After initial contact, the stalker develops feelings like
infatuation, and therefore places the love object on a pedestal.
-
The stalker then begins to
approach the object. It might take a while, but once contact is made, the
stalker's behavior sets him up for rejection.
-
Rejection triggers the
delusion through which the stalker projects his own feelings onto the object:
"She loves me, too."
-
The stalker also develops
intense anger to mask his shame, which fuels the obsessive pursuit of the
object. He now wants to control through harassment or injury.
-
The stalker must restore
his narcissistic fantasy.
-
Violence is most
likely to occur when the love object is devalued, as through an imagined
betrayal.
-
Simple obsessional: The most common form is male with a
female with whom he was once sexually intimate.
-
Love obsessional: A
love-obsessed stalker tends to idealize a celebrity or someone he has seen from
afar and he develops an unrealistic belief that the target person will agree to
a relationship.
-
Erotomania: Someone
suffering from this more extreme obsession believes that the victim loves him or
her.
-
False victimization: Claiming harassment and
stalking when none exists, this behavior is usually carried on by people with
histrionic personality disorders.
Another method of
categorizing stalkers comes from the team who wrote the FBI's Crime
Classification Manual:
-
Non-domestic stalker, who
has no personal relationship with the victim.
-
Organized (based in a
calculated, controlled aggression).
-
Delusional (based in a
fixation like erotomania).
-
Domestic stalker, who has had a prior relationship
with the victim and feels motivated to continue the relationship; this
constitutes. http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/psychology/stalkers/5.html
Miss Prantil fits into a
lot of these profiles as well because she's notorious for falsely associating
with high profile persons, or companies such as CNN, HBO, many well known
Politicians, Actors, Actresses, Models and Musicians etc., and then claims that
she's the "victim" of a "Celebrity Stalker" being us, no less. Prantil even
made a statement once in which she wrote that she was "going to be our
trademark."
She likes to lead people
to believe that she herself is a "celebrity comedianne" that further, leads
folks to believe that she is a happy and successful life while maintaining a six
figure annual income. One week she pretends to be a film producer making a new
movie and the next having a successful media career along with being a
professional comedianne, etc. What a busy life, huh?
Even though we might know
what makes this SICKO Prantil person tick, we believe to ignore this Beast just
wouldn't be prudent. Especially, when running an online business to which she
constantly uses as a platform to launch her character assassination attacks
against us through.
Not too long ago in the
recent past, these deluded people like Mary Prantil didn't really have the tools
to make a menace out of themselves past posting some trash on a few little
complaint sites, but now it has been made easy for the "Troll" through the scam
forums and other mediums, as you all know.
This idiot stalker has not
only stalked us for going on four years now, but has recently threatened to kill
me personally on one of the scam sites via posting to me, "You Will Die Mr. X".
Damn, I wish she would put
her money where her mouth is because I'd love to put a end to her stalking once
and for all.
Perhaps by aiding the
police in acquiring a very, VERY long prison sentence for her as a result of her
cowardly criminal activities. Of course, our stalker knows that she's always
welcome to come on out and try killing me any time she likes. Prantil is nothing
but a stalking asshole wuss.
Any old way, It would seem
that Prantil shares a good many traits to the various types of stalkers cited
above, So what does this make her? I mean, what classification would she fall
into? Is, she yet another breed of obsessed stalking psychopath and socialpath
spring up out of the shit pot? I think she might be the "Queen" of all
criminals.
I'm not an expert on
criminals or crazy people and thus, I really don't know how to define Mary
Prantil that doesn't like me mentioning her pathetic name.
All I know is that she
will keep screwing around until the law takes her down in a hard way, as I think
will happen January 11 th 2011 when she goes back to court there in New York to
face her nine criminal charges.
I really hope they convict
this moron on all the criminal charges pending against her currently in NYC so
that the world can be rid of one more pain in the ass stupid criminal. So that
many of the folks she has harassed can rest and get back to their lives once
more without having to deal with this piece of Prantil trash EVERYDAY.
Any way, until then, I
will post, and we will warn everyone on the Internet about this waste of a life
Prantil either until she stops running her mouth about us personally, or she's
imprisoned, perhaps both. Maybe we will just keep warning folks about her no
matter the out come just for shits and giggles.
Why? Because we never want
to see a person like this do what she's carried out against us to another
innocent person not ever.
This page is a post on
other mediums and so I'll just say to those reading this off of those sites:
Please come and visit us at www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net as we have Mary T. Prantil's voice, transcripts, eye witness
accounts, current criminal records, civil lawsuits filed against prantil and
much more in the way of evidence against this low life criminal.
Thank You so much for
taking the time in reading this guys. Be Alert, Be Safe and God Bless One And
All.
Jim Morgan & Jan
Windglows
|